Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Efflux and motility are two key biological functions in bacteria. Recent findings have shown that efflux impacts flagellum biosynthesis and motility inEscherichia coliand other bacteria. AcrR is known to be the major transcriptional repressor of AcrAB-TolC, the main multidrug efflux pump inE. coliand otherEnterobacteriaceae. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of how efflux and motility are co-regulated remain poorly understood. Here, we have studied the role of AcrR in direct regulation of motility inE. coli. By combining bioinformatics, electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), gene expression, and motility experiments, we have found that AcrR represses motility inE. coliby directly repressing transcription of theflhDCoperon, but not the other flagellum genes/operons tested.flhDCencodes the master regulator of flagellum biosynthesis and motility genes. We found that such regulation primarily occurs by direct binding of AcrR to theflhDCpromoter region containing the first of the two predicted AcrR-binding sites identified in this promoter. This is the first report of direct regulation by AcrR of genes unrelated to efflux or detoxification. Moreover, we report that overexpression of AcrR restores to parental levels the increased swimming motility previously observed inE. colistrains without a functional AcrAB-TolC pump, and that such effect by AcrR is prevented by the AcrR ligand and AcrAB-TolC substrate ethidium bromide. Based on these and prior findings, we provide a novel model in which AcrR senses efflux and then co-regulates efflux and motility inE. colito maintain homeostasis and escape hazards. IMPORTANCEEfflux and motility play a major role in bacterial growth, colonization, and survival. InEscherichia coli, the transcriptional repressor AcrR is known to directly repress efflux and was later found to also repress flagellum biosynthesis and motility by Kim et al. (J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:1824–1828, 2016, doi: 10.4014/jmb.1607.07058). However, it remained unknown whether AcrR represses flagellum biosynthesis and motility directly and through which target genes, or indirectly because of altering the amount of efflux. This study reveals that AcrR represses flagellum biosynthesis and motility by directly repressing the expression of theflhDCmaster regulator of flagellum biosynthesis and motility genes, but not the other flagellum genes tested. We also show that the antimicrobial, efflux pump substrate, and AcrR ligand ethidium bromide regulates motility via AcrR. Overall, these findings support a novel model of direct co-regulation of efflux and motility mediated by AcrR in response to stress inE. coli. 

ABSTRACT Corrosion inhibitors, including zinc orthophosphate, sodium orthophosphate, and sodium silicate, are commonly used to prevent the corrosion of drinking water infrastructure. Metals such as zinc are known stressors for antibiotic resistance selection, and phosphates can increase microbial growth in drinking water distribution systems (DWDS). Yet, the influence of corrosion inhibitor type on antimicrobial resistance in DWDS is unknown. Here, we show that sodium silicates can decrease antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs), while zinc orthophosphate increases ARB and ARGs in source water microbial communities. Based on controlled bench-scale studies, zinc orthophosphate addition significantly increased the abundance of ARB resistant to ciprofloxacin, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, and vancomycin, as well as the genessul1,qacEΔ1, an indication of resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds, and the integron-integrase geneintI1. In contrast, sodium silicate dosage at 10 mg/L resulted in decreased bacterial growth and antibiotic resistance selection compared to the other corrosion inhibitor additions. Source water collected from the drinking water treatment plant intake pipe resulted in less significant changes in ARB and ARG abundance due to corrosion inhibitor addition compared to source water collected from the pier at the recreational beach. In tandem with the antibiotic resistance shifts, significant microbial community composition changes also occurred. Overall, the corrosion inhibitor sodium silicate resulted in the least selection for antibiotic resistance, which suggests it is the preferred corrosion inhibitor option for minimizing antibiotic resistance proliferation in DWDS. However, the selection of an appropriate corrosion inhibitor must also be appropriate for the water chemistry of the system (e.g., pH, alkalinity) to minimize metal leaching first and foremost and to adhere to the lead and copper rule. IMPORTANCEAntibiotic resistance is a growing public health concern across the globe and was recently labeled the silent pandemic. Scientists aim to identify the source of antibiotic resistance and control points to mitigate the spread of antibiotic resistance. Drinking water is a direct exposure route to humans and contains antibiotic-resistant bacteria and associated resistance genes. Corrosion inhibitors are added to prevent metallic pipes in distribution systems from corroding, and the type of corrosion inhibitor selected could also have implications on antibiotic resistance. Indeed, we found that sodium silicate can minimize selection of antibiotic resistance while phosphate-based corrosion inhibitors can promote antibiotic resistance. These findings indicate that sodium silicate is a preferred corrosion inhibitor choice for mitigation of antibiotic resistance. 

ABSTRACT The transcriptional repressor AcrR is the main regulator of the multidrug efflux pump AcrAB-TolC, which plays a major role in antibiotic resistance and cell physiology in Escherichia coli and other Enterobacteriaceae . However, it remains unknown which ligands control the function of AcrR. To address this gap in knowledge, this study tested whether exogenous and/or endogenous molecules identified as potential AcrR ligands regulate the activity of AcrR. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) with purified AcrR and the acrAB promoter and in vivo gene expression experiments, we found that AcrR responds to both exogenous molecules and cellular metabolites produced by E. coli . In total, we identified four functional ligands of AcrR, ethidium bromide (EtBr), an exogenous antimicrobial known to be effluxed by the AcrAB-TolC pump and previously shown to bind to AcrR, and three polyamines produced by E. coli , namely, putrescine, cadaverine, and spermidine. We found that EtBr and polyamines bind to AcrR both in vitro and in vivo , which prevents the binding of AcrR to the acrAB promoter and, ultimately, induces the expression of acrAB . Finally, we also found that AcrR contributes to mitigating the toxicity produced by excess polyamines by directly regulating the expression of AcrAB-TolC and two previously unknown AcrR targets, the MdtJI spermidine efflux pump and the putrescine degradation enzyme PuuA. Overall, these findings significantly expand our understanding of the function of AcrR by revealing that this regulator responds to different exogenous and endogenous ligands to regulate the expression of multiple genes involved in efflux and detoxification. IMPORTANCE Multidrug efflux pumps can remove antibiotics and other toxic molecules from cells and are major contributors to antibiotic resistance and bacterial physiology. Therefore, it is essential to better understand their function and regulation. AcrAB-TolC is the main multidrug efflux pump in the Enterobacteriaceae family, and AcrR is its major transcriptional regulator. However, little is known about which ligands control the function of AcrR or which other genes are controlled by this regulator. This study contributes to addressing these gaps in knowledge by showing that (i) the activity of AcrR is controlled by the antimicrobial ethidium bromide and by polyamines produced by E. coli , and (ii) AcrR directly regulates the expression of AcrAB-TolC and genes involved in detoxification and efflux of excess polyamines. These findings significantly advance our understanding of the biological role of AcrR by identifying four ligands that control its function and two novel targets of this regulator.